SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1324

S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Attar Singh Kaushik – Appellant
Versus
Secretary/Commr. Transport Department – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.

1.Leave Granted.

2.Inter se seniority amongst the deputationists is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 13.9.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellant herein assailing the order of the Tribunal dated 18.9.2003 allowing the original application filed by Visheshwar Dayal Sharma was dismissed. With a view to appreciate the fact of the matter involved herein, we may notice the particulars of the requisite service records amongst others of the Appellant vis-`-vis Respondent No.2 herein : Seniority List Date of promotion as A.S.I. 1. Inder Pal Singh01.01.19872.Mathura Prasad08.02.19883.Vishveshwar Dayal Sharma03.06.1988 (Respondent)4.Kartar Singh29.06.19885.Ramesh Chander28.08.19896.Tara Prasad28.08.19897.Attar Singh Kaushik08.02.1990 (Appellant)8.Joginder Singh30.01.1991

3.Indisputably, Appellant was appointed as a Constable. He was promoted in the year 1980; whereas the respondent was appointed as a Head Constable on or about 28.4.1982. They both were promoted to the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector, the respondent on 3.6.1988 and the appel















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top