S.B. Sinha & Harjit Singh Bedi
Basanti Devi PETITIONER
Versus
Raviprakash Ramprasad Jaiswal RESPONDENT
Appeal (civil) 4896 of 2007
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 20484 of 2006)
Decided on: 12/10/2007
Indian Succession Act - Section 263, Section 283; Hindu Succession Act - Section 3(f), Section 15, Section 8. The Court analyzed the provisions of the Indian Succession Act and the Hindu Succession Act to determine the validity of the application for revocation of probate. It discussed the definition of 'heir' under Section 3(f) of the Hindu Succession Act and the general rules of succession in the case of female Hindus under Section 15. It also referred to Section 8 of the Act to ascertain the heirs of the husband in case of intestate succession. The Court highlighted the mandatory nature of the provisions of Section 283 and the applicability of Explanation (c) of Section 263 in revoking probate obtained by means of an untrue allegation of a fact essential in point of law.
Fact of the Case:
A Will was executed by Lakhpati Devi in favor of the respondent. The appellant claimed that another will was executed in her favor. The respondent filed an application for grant of probate, but did not disclose the existence of the other property in Uttar Pradesh. The probate was granted without complying with the requirements of law. The appellant filed an application for revocation of the grant of probate on the ground that she was not cited as an heir. The application was dismissed by the High Court. On appeal, the Court held that the application for revocation should have been entertained.
Finding of the Court:
The Court analyzed the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act and the Indian Succession Act. It held that the agnates of the deceased are also heirs. It also held that the requirements of Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act were not complied with, and therefore, an application for revocation of probate was maintainable. The Court referred to the explanation (c) of Section 263 of the Act, which allows revocation of probate obtained by means of an untrue allegation of a fact essential in point of law. The Court also referred to precedents that established the limited jurisdiction of the Probate Court and the right to file an application for revocation of probate on valid grounds.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that an application for revocation of probate should have been entertained in this case due to non-compliance with the requirements of law and the existence of valid grounds for revocation.
Result: The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Probate Court for further consideration.
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. A short but interesting question which arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether an application under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act for revocation of grant of probate would be maintainable, inter alia, on the premise that the appellant s name was not cited in the said application for grant of probate.
3. The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute.
4. A Will was executed by one Lakhpati Devi widow of late Mahadeo Jaiswal in favour of the respondent herein who was one of the grand sons of late Bhagwatidina, one of the brothers of late Mahadeo Prasad. Appellant herein claimed that the said Lakhpati Devi had executed another will on or about 12.3.1996. The said Lakhpati Devi admittedly expired on 13.03.1996. Whereas the appellant did not file any application for grant of probate in relation to the aforementioned will dated 12.03.1996, the respondent did so on 6.9.1996. In the said application, it was contended that the properties under the Will are situated in Bombay stating : That the said deceased at the time of her death had a fixed place of abode at Room No.10-11, Bharat Building, Sonapur Lane, Chira Bazar, Mumbai 400 002 and left property within Greater Bombay in the State of Maharashtra. It was furthermore stated : That no application has been made to any District Court or District Delegate or to any other High Court for probate of any will of the said deceased or for Letter of Administration with or without the Will annexed to her property and credits.
5. However, an application for amendment of the application for grant of probate was filed in the said testamentary proceedings which was allowed. On the basis of the averments made by the respondent in the amended application, citations were published only at Bombay on 28.1.1997. Respondent, however, filed an application for amendment of the petition for grant of probate on 21.03.1997, inter alia, stating : That the said deceased at the time of her death had a fixed place of abode at Room No.10-11, Bharat Building, Sonapur Lane, Chira Bazar, Mumbai -400 002 and left property within Greater Bombay in the State of Maharashtra and elsewhere in Union of India. It was, therefore, not disclosed at what other places the properties are situated.
6. It was furthermore averred that there was no heir known to the petitioner on the side of husband of the deceased. The schedule of assets allegedly left by the deceased was also inserted in the schedule of the properties stating :1.All that piece and parcel of pension tax land of ground (since redeemed) with the messauges tentament or dwelling house standing thereon situate lying behind at Sonapur Street Girgaum Road outside the Fort of Bombay in the Registration Sub-District of Bombay in the land of the Bombay contained by admeasurement 243 )two hundred and forty three) square yards or thereabouts and registered in the Books of Collector New No. 980 New Survey No.8158 and Cadastral Survey No.567 of Bhuleshwar Division and in the books of the Collector of Municipal Rates and Taxes under (C) wards No.3385 and Street No.6 and bounded as follows : that is to say on or towards the East by the properties bearings Cadastral Survey Nos.570, 571, 572, 573 and 574 on or towards the west partly by the properties bearing Cadastral Survey No.565 and 566 and partly by a passage on or towards the north by the property bearing Cadastral Survey No.568 and or towards the south by the Sonapur Street Valued atAccrued gross rent of the above immoveable property from the date of death till filing of this petitionRs.1,00,000/- Rs. 7,500/-2.S.B. A/c No.21416 with Bank of India, Kolabadevi Branch Mombai-2 standing in the name of deceased with accrued interest upto date of filing this petitionRs. 1,000/-3.Amount standing to the credit of the deceased in current A/c No.31080 with Bank of India Kolabadi Branch Mumbai standing in the name of M/s Mahadeo forthwith in which deceased
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.