SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 279

(BEFORE B.P. SINGH AND ALTAMAS KABIR, JJ.)
SALIM JAVED - Appellant;
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 347 of 2006
Decided on March 27, 2006

Headnote:The appeal is allowed.

ORDER

1. We have heard counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo 7 years' rigorous imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 304-B IPC and 2 years' RI with a fine of Rs 500 for an offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC. The appellant's appeal is pending in the High Court. His submission is that there is no chance of his appeal being heard in the near future. The appellant has already suffered sentence of 3 years and 6 months. In these circumstances, we allow this appeal and direct that the appellant shall be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond and surety to the satisfaction of the trial court.

4. The appeal is allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top