SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 73

TARUN CHATTERJEE, ASHOK BHAN
RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJU YADAV ALIAS RAJ KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant was, inter alia, charged for commission of the offence under Section 376 IPC. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 376 IPC and sentenced him to undergo 7 years' rigorous imprisonment. In appeal, the High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant. The appellant approached this Court by filing the special leave petition, which came up for hearing on 7-10-2005, when this Court issued notice limited to the question of sentence.

3. Heard the counsel appearing for the appellant as well as for the respondent State.

4. It is stated that the appellant has already undergone approximately three-and-a-half years' incarceration.

5. Keeping in view the fact that there was a delay of three days in lodging the FIR and the fact that the doctor (PW 6), who examined the victim, in her testimony has deposed that she did not find any confirmatory evidence of rape on the victim, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, we deem it appropriate to reduce the sentence awarded to the appellant to the period already undergone. Ordered accordingly.

6. The appellant be released forthwith if not required in any othe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top