SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 147

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY – Appellant
Versus
PARAS NATH TIWARI – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant is the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, established under the provisions of the Institute of Technology Act, 1961, which gives technical education of a very high standard to students. The Institute has a department known as "Aeronautical Engineering Department" in which technical education is imparted to students with respect to several aspects of aeronautics. For this purpose, the Institute owns two Piper aircrafts, one Cessna aircraft and one Hansa aircraft. We are informed by Mr. Ganguli, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, that these aircrafts are flown periodically and used for teaching several aspects of aeronautical engineering to the students.

2. Under the provisions of the Aircraft Act, 1934 read with the rules framed there under (the Aircraft Rules, 1937) all such aircrafts, even if they be privately owned, have to be maintained by qualified engineers licensed by the Director General of Civil Aviation (in short "DGCA") with regard to the type of aircraft they are required to maintain.

3. By an advertisement dated 23-12-1987 the appellant advertised several posts and one such post was the post of Maintenance Engineer (Aircraft). The qu




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top