RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
VINOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. The question involved in this appeal is whether the interest is payable on arrears of salary to which the respondent became entitled by being retrospectively promoted. The Food and Civil Supplies Department, the Department concerned of the appellant, was the respondent in several writ petitions filed by its employees with regard to their respective claims for promotion. Diverse orders were passed on these writ petitions. All matters ultimately came up before this Court when this Court on 7-1-1997 set aside all the orders passed by the various Benches of the High Court and directed that fresh promotions should be made with retrospective effect according to the State-level seniority list submitted to this Court. In respect of those who have been promoted prior to 1-1-1985, it was directed that if they were promoted by the V.P. Regularisation of Ad hoc Promotions (on Posts within the Purview of PSC) Rules, 1988, they were not to be disturbed. This Court also went on to say that those promoted with retrospective effect would be entitled to all pecuniary benefits on such promotion.
3. According to the seniority list which was the subject-matter of scrutiny by thi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.