ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate passed an order on 12-11-1997 t directing the respondent to pay Rs 10,000 on account of meher. Against the said order when the Sessions Court was moved by the appellant, that application was allowed, the order passed by the trial court was set aside and it was directed that the appellant shall be entitled to meher amount to the tune of Rs 50,000 on the basis of evidence adduced on behalf of the appellant that at the time of marriage the meher amount was fixed at Rs 49,999. It further directed to return all the ornaments. Against the said order when the High Court was moved, by the impugned order, the aforesaid order passed by the Revisional Court has been set aside and that passed by the trial court restored on the grounds inter alia that the revision application was barred by limitation and counsel for the appellant having accepted the amount awarded by the trial court, the appellant was estopped from challenging the order of the trial a court before the higher court. Against the said order, the present appeal by special leave has been filed.

4. Having heard the parties and perused