S.H.KAPADIA, Y.K.SABHARWAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER
IA No. 1360 in IAs Nos. 1130 and 1152 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995
1. The recommendations of CEC dated 15-7-2005 are accepted. The Committee, suggested in para 10 of the recommendations, shall frame guidelines, if not already framed on the basis where of, it would prepare the seniority list of eligible sawmills and other wood-based industries which will be considered for grant of licence in order of seniority. The case of the applicants in IAs Nos. 1130 and 1152 would, of course, be considered by the Committee. The applicants can approach the Committee.
2. The interlocutory applications are disposed of. IAs Nos. 1362-63 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995 3. The response to the applications shall be filed by Respondents 1, 2, 3 and CEC within four weeks.
4. Rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
5. List these applications after six weeks. IA No. 35 in IA No. 32 in WP (C) No. 171 of 1996
6. Having considered the recommendations of CEC, Interlocutory Applications Nos. 32 and 35 are dismissed.
7. Counsel for the State Government submits that after instructions, fresh application may be filed giving valid reasons.
IA No. 1369 in IA No. 956 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995
8. The recommendations of CEC da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.