SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1229

S.H.KAPADIA, Y.K.SABHARWAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

IA No. 1360 in IAs Nos. 1130 and 1152 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

1. The recommendations of CEC dated 15-7-2005 are accepted. The Committee, suggested in para 10 of the recommendations, shall frame guidelines, if not already framed on the basis where of, it would prepare the seniority list of eligible sawmills and other wood-based industries which will be considered for grant of licence in order of seniority. The case of the applicants in IAs Nos. 1130 and 1152 would, of course, be considered by the Committee. The applicants can approach the Committee.

2. The interlocutory applications are disposed of. IAs Nos. 1362-63 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995 3. The response to the applications shall be filed by Respondents 1, 2, 3 and CEC within four weeks.

4. Rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.

5. List these applications after six weeks. IA No. 35 in IA No. 32 in WP (C) No. 171 of 1996

6. Having considered the recommendations of CEC, Interlocutory Applications Nos. 32 and 35 are dismissed.

7. Counsel for the State Government submits that after instructions, fresh application may be filed giving valid reasons.

IA No. 1369 in IA No. 956 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

8. The recommendations of CEC da














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top