SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 193

A.P.SEN, L.M.SHARMA
NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY EMPLOYEES UNION – Appellant
Versus
IIIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FARUKHABAD – Respondent


ORDER

1. In this special leave petition notice was confined to the question as to whether the direction made by the High Court designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the North Eastern Railway Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, should be substituted by the Registrar of Trade Unions, Uttar Pradesh. In response to the notice, the respondents have appeared and when the case was taken up, a prayer was made on behalf of Respondent 6, General Manager, North Eastern Railway for adjournment to enable him to file a counter-affidavit. We decline the prayer as we do not see any necessity for any such affidavit by him.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as contesting Respondents 2, 3 and 4. The Registrar of Trade Unions is the authority charged with the duty of administering the provisions of the Trade Unions Act. The High Court was obviously in error in designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the Trade Union. We accordingly grant special leave, modify the direction made by the High Court and direct instead that the elections

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top