(BEFORE A.P. SEN AND L.M. SHARMA, JJ.)
NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY EMPLOYEES UNION AND OTHERS - Appellants;
Versus
IIIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FARUKHABAD AND OTHERS Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 829 of 1988 in SLP No. 15345 of 1987,
decided on March 9, 1988
Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Special Leave Petition - Elections - special leave petition notice was confined to the question as to whether the direction made by the High Court designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the North Eastern Railway Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, should be substituted by the Registrar of Trade Unions, Uttar Pradesh. In response to the notice, the respondents have appeared and when the case was taken up, a prayer was made on behalf of Respondent 6, General Manager, and North Eastern Railway for adjournment to enable him to file a counter-affidavit. We decline the prayer as we do not see any necessity for any such affidavit by him – Held, We have heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as contesting Respondents 2, 3 and 4 - Registrar of Trade Unions is the authority charged with the duty of administering the provisions of the Trade Unions Act. The High Court was obviously in error in designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the Trade Union - We accordingly grant special leave, modify the direction made by the High Court and direct instead that the elections will be held under the supervision of the Registrar of Trade Unions or by an officer designated by him for that purpose. The judgment of the High Court stands modified to the extent indicated - Appeal is disposed of
ORDER
1. In this special leave petition notice was confined to the question as to whether the direction made by the High Court designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the North Eastern Railway Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, should be substituted by the Registrar of Trade Unions, Uttar Pradesh. In response to the notice, the respondents have appeared and when the case was taken up, a prayer was made on behalf of Respondent 6, General Manager, North Eastern Railway for adjournment to enable him to file a counter-affidavit. We decline the prayer as we do not see any necessity for any such affidavit by him.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as contesting Respondents 2, 3 and 4. The Registrar of Trade Unions is the authority charged with the duty of administering the provisions of the Trade Unions Act. The High Court was obviously in error in designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the Trade Union. We accordingly grant special leave, modify the direction made by the High Court and direct instead that the elections will be held under the supervision of the Registrar of Trade Unions or by an officer designated by him for that purpose. The judgment of the High Court stands modified to the extent indicated.
3. The appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.