SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 262

G.B.PATTANAIK, S.N.VARIAVA, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
PUTTI LAL – Respondent


ORDER

1. IA for discharge of advocate is allowed.

2. These appeals and the special leave petitions are directed against one and the same judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court. The High Court disposed of a batch of appeals by a common judgment. The respondents were daily-rated wage earners in the Forest Department having I already served the Department for several years. They approached the High Court for regularisation of their services. The Division Bench of the High Court by judgment dated 10-12-1997 called upon the Government to frame a scheme as to how the services of these daily-rated workers could be regularised. A committee was directed to be constituted consisting of Secretary (Finance), Secretary (Forest) and the Legal Rememberancers or I their nominees, which committee was called upon to frame the scheme for regularisation of the daily-rated employees working in the Forest Department. The High Court also came to hold that these daily-rated workers should be paid at the minimum of the pay scale that is available for a regular worker in the corresponding post in the Government. This Court, after issuing notice by order dated 13-5-1998, directed maintenan






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top