ORDER

1. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent State.

2. Leave granted.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the appellants, pointing out to the various reliefs sought for in the writ petition and referring to the grounds raised in the review petition seeking review of the impugned order as well as the written submissions said to have been filed on their behalf before the High Court after taking leave, orally by the learned counsel, that the High Court did not deal with all the contentions raised by the appellants in the writ petition and did not consider the grounds raised in the review petition. The impugned order only deals with the appointment of Shri Y.A. Patharikar as Joint Charity Commissioner and orders dated 10-9-2001 and 13-9-2001, although other orders were also challenged in the writ petition.

4. Despite service of notice, the contesting respondents are neither present nor represented.

5. The learned counsel for the State, however, made submissions justifying the appointment of Shri Y.A. Patharikar as Joint Charity Commissioner.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that the High Cou