SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 421

H.K.SEMA, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T. N. – Appellant
Versus
ESLIAN ALIAS JOTHI BASU – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

3. Despite notice none entered appearance on behalf of the sole respondent, namely, Eslian @ Jothi Basu (A-11). From the record, it appeared that A-II assaulted the deceased from back side of the head. This is a case of Double murder and there are eyewitnesses to the occurrence.

4. Without considering the material facts on record, and without assigning any reason, the High Court by the impugned order has granted bail to the accused. As is presently advised there is sufficient material on record against A-II. One of the considerations for granting bail in non-bailable offence must be the gravity and the nature of the offence. There were no mitigating circumstances and the High Court was not justified in granting bail.

5. The appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned order of the High Court.

6. The respondent is on bail. His bail bond and surety stand cancelled. He is directed to be taken back to the custody forthwith.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top