SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 474

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
NIRA RADIA – Appellant
Versus
DHEERAJ SINGH – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. We find that while dealing with an application for bail, the learned Single Judge of the High Court has made elaborate and detailed analysis of the evidence/materials and has recorded findings which virtually amounts to acceptability or otherwise thereof. This is not the course to be adopted by the High Court while dealing with a bail application. Though, some reference to the materials would be necessary, that would not be a substitute for making a detailed and in-depth analysis of the materials and recording findings on their acceptability or otherwise. That essentially is a matter for trial. In this view of the matter, we set aside the order of the High Court, remit the matter to the High Court for a fresh consideration of the bail application. We request the High Court to take up the bail application afresh on 17-5-2006. Learned counsel for the parties have stated that they shall appear on that date before the High Court. The learned Acting Chief Justice of the High Court is requested to allot the matter to the appropriate Bench for hearing on the date indicated. The High Court is requested to dispose of the mat



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top