ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
NIRA RADIA – Appellant
Versus
DHEERAJ SINGH – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Leave granted.
3. We find that while dealing with an application for bail, the learned Single Judge of the High Court has made elaborate and detailed analysis of the evidence/materials and has recorded findings which virtually amounts to acceptability or otherwise thereof. This is not the course to be adopted by the High Court while dealing with a bail application. Though, some reference to the materials would be necessary, that would not be a substitute for making a detailed and in-depth analysis of the materials and recording findings on their acceptability or otherwise. That essentially is a matter for trial. In this view of the matter, we set aside the order of the High Court, remit the matter to the High Court for a fresh consideration of the bail application. We request the High Court to take up the bail application afresh on 17-5-2006. Learned counsel for the parties have stated that they shall appear on that date before the High Court. The learned Acting Chief Justice of the High Court is requested to allot the matter to the appropriate Bench for hearing on the date indicated. The High Court is requested to dispose of the mat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.