SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 704

TARUN CHATTERJEE, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Devendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY,J.

Leave granted.

2.These appeals have been preferred against the common judgment and order of the Allahabad High Court dated 14.5.2004 passed in Special Appeal No. 461 of 2004.

3.We have elaborately heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and the material made available on record.

4.The facts leading to filing of these appeals are not required to be noticed in detail for a very short and simple question falls for consideration viz. as to whether the authorities were right in not selecting the appellants to undergo B.T.C. Training Course, 2004.

5.The State of Uttar Pradesh as a measure of policy decision has decided to arrange the Special BTC Training Course for a period of six months to as many as 46,189 candidates possessing B.Ed./L.T. course. The National Teachers Education Board accorded its approval to the proposal submitted by the State of Uttar Pradesh for arranging the Special BTC Training Course for a period of 6 months to all those candidates with a requisite qualification of B.Ed./L.T. course. The Government order dated 14.1.2004 makes it abundantly clear it is a Special BTC Train







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top