P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN, V.S.SIRPURKAR
C. M. C. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Unit Trust of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.—
1.Leave granted.
2.The appellant and respondent NO.1 entered into an agreement dated 23.10.1992 for a Technology Upgrade Project of the latter. The said agreement contained an arbitration clause. The same read:
“20.In the event of any dispute or difference relating to the interpretation or application of any of the provision of this Agreement or as to the performance of any obligation by either party shall be settled by arbitration. Each party shall appoint an arbitrator and the arbitrators so appointed shall appoint an umpire to whom the matter on which the arbitrators disagree will be referred. The decision of the arbitrators and in the event of there being disagreement between the arbitrators, the decision of the umpire shall be final, conclusive and binding on the parties with respect to the matter referred to arbitration. The decision of the arbitrators or the umpire as the case may be shall constitute arbitrators award for the purpose of Indian Arbitration Act, 1940. The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the rules prescribed by the Indian Council of Arbitration.”
2.Disputes arose between the parties. On 16.5.2002, resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.