SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 100

S.B.SINHA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
Neebha Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Jayantilal Khandwala – Respondent


judgment

S.B. Sinha, J. —

1. Leave granted.

2.Appellant herein questions a judgment and order dated 13.02.2007 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court granting unconditional leave to defend in a summary suit wherein summons for judgment had been taken out.

3. Appellant filed the aforementioned suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 25,00,000/- with interest, which amount he is said to have advanced to the respondents by a cheque. Respondents allegedly executed a promissory note for the said amount. An amount of Rs. 5,27,293/- was said to have been repaid by way of interest. A certificate of deduction of tax at source under Section 203 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the amount of tax deducted is said to have been issued to the appellant. A post dated cheque for Rs. 25,00,000/- was also given. Respondents also allegedly issued the following cheques towards payment of interest accrued, the details whereof are as under:

Cheque No.DateAmount

9489212-1-200367,903/-

94892831-1-200312,500/-

9489293-2-200312,500

4. All the four cheques having not been honoured, complaint petitions were filed. Allegedly all original documents, viz., promissory note and four cheques, which were filed in




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top