SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 259

S.B.SINHA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
Management, The Assistant Salt Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Central Salt Mazdoor Union – Respondent


judgment

S.B. Sinha, J. –

1.Leave granted.

2.Assistant Salt Commissioner, the appellant herein, is responsible for monitoring production and supply of salt within his jurisdiction. Salt Commission is attached to the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (Salt Desk), Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

3.The Parliament enacted Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (the Act) to consolidate and amend the law relating to central duties of excise and to salt.

4.Chapter V of the said Act provides for special provisions relating to salt. Salt manufacture etc. is dealt with in Chapter VI of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Rule 102 prohibits manufacture of salt except under a licence. Such a licence is to be granted by the Collector within the meaning of the provisions of the said Act.

“Rules 129 and 130 of the said Rules read as under:

Rule 129. Licensees to maintain in good order roads, channels, reservoirs, etc.The licensee at each salt factory shall be bound, at his own expense, to construct and maintain within the limits of the factory in good repair to the satisfaction of the Collector all roads and all channels, reservoirs, embankments, drying grounds, platforms and other works used o
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top