SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1624

S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
RAMESHWAR DASS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT stood trial for commission of an offence under Section 304b of the Indian Penal Code in connection with unnatural death of his wife Sushma Rani.

( 2 ) THEY were married on 11. 03. 1986. An engagement ceremony took place twenty days prior thereto. A demand for dowry was made. It was met in part. A sum of Rs. 25,000/- by way of a demand draft was handed over to the husband 's family at Mansa when shagun ceremony was performed. Allegedly another sum of Rs. 11,000/- was paid in cash, as further demand was made by the family of the appellant. However, allegedly at the time of marriage the parents of the appellant demanded a further sum of Rs. 40,000/-in cash which could not be fulfilled. For non-fulfillment of the said demand, the deceased was allegedly tortured.

( 3 ) APPELLANT had sent a telegram on 16. 04. 1988 to Des Raj stating: "mutual MISUNDERSTANDING REACH immediately - RAMESHWAR" on or about 4. 06. 1986, Sat Paul, brother of the deceased (PW-1), visited the house of his brother-in-law Raj Kumar (PW-2), which is situate in the village, where the incident took place and stayed there for the night. On the morning of the next day, both of them vis



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top