SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1590

ARIJIT PASAYAT, AFTAB ALAM
GENERAL MANAGER, UCO BANK – Appellant
Versus
M. VENURANGANATH – Respondent


ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the Judgment of a Division bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court allowing the writ appeal filed by the respondent.

( 3 ) BACKGROUND facts in a nutshell are as follows: the respondent, who, at the relevant point of time was branch Manager of appellant No. l-Bank and was posted at nellore in Andhra Pradesh was charged and tried along with one Shrinivasulu s/o Chenchuramaiah for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 471 and 477 of Indian penal Code 1860 (in short the 'the IPC') and Section 5 (2) read with Section 5 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (in short the 'prevention of Corruption Act' ). Both the accused persons were tried in the Court of Special Judge for CBI cases. They were acquitted by judgment dated 11. 12. 2002 giving them benefit of doubt. The respondent was placed under suspension from 15. 06. 1988 till he was reinstated on 04. 05. 1993. After his reinstatement, departmental proceedings were initiated. The same were questioned by a writ petition being writ Petition No. 15797 of 1994 which was allowed by learned Single Judge. But in writ appeal No. 884 of 1998, a divisio



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top