SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 262

S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
VIJAY SINGH CHARAK – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


MARKANDEY KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court dated 26. 5. 1999 in LPA (SW) No. 222/99.

( 2 ) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. The facts of the case are that a Select List dated 28. 3. 1991 was prepared for induction of State Forest Service officials of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Forest Service (hereinafter refereed to as 'ifs' ). The appellant's name figured in the Select List at serial number 26. The total number of vacancies were 35, and hence ordinarily the appellant should have been selected and appointed. However, the Select List was challenged in a batch of writ petitions which were disposed of by a Division Bench of the High Court dated 12. 3. 1993. The operative portion of that order states: this order will dispose of writ petitions Nos. 400/90, 80, 249, 618, 933, 619, 1395 of 1991, 264, 208, 287 and 266 of 1992, because they raise a common question of law and fact. Learned Counsel for the respondent-State has placed on record a copy of the communication dated 11. 3. 1993 wherein it has been stated: in case the petitioners withdraw the writ petitions, Government s








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top