Supreme Court Of India
GENERAL INSURANCE COUNCIL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH - Respondent
Writ Petition 282 Of 2007
Decided On : 07/09/2007
.
Motor Vehicles Act - Compliance with Section 158(6) - Act Section List: 158(6), Rule 150, Form 54 - The court directed the State governments and Union Territories to ensure compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 158(6) of the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing the need for prompt action and periodic checks to prevent non-compliance.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought direction for compliance with Section 158(6) of the Motor Vehicles Act, highlighting the non-compliance and the concerns raised by the Union of India.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was a statutory requirement to comply with Section 158(6) and expressed disappointment at the lack of actual implementation.
Issues: Non-compliance with the statutory requirements of Section 158(6) of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for prompt action and periodic checks to ensure compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 158(6) and directed the authorities to take appropriate action against non-compliance.
Final Decision: The court directed the State governments and Union Territories to ensure compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 158(6) of the Motor Vehicles Act and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
( 1 ) PRAYER in this writ petition is for direction to the various States Governments and the Union territories to ensure that the mandate of Section 158 (6) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short the 'act') is complied with without exception. It is stated that Section 158 (6) of the Act casts a statutory obligation on the concerned police officers forward to Claims Tribunal having jurisdiction about the death or bodily Injury any person so recorded In the police station. Further mandate is contained In the provision about the sending copy thereof to the concerned insurer and the owner of the offending vehicle. The owner of the vehicle is obligated to forward the report to the Claims Tribunal and the insurer. The Union of india has expressed its concern about the apparent non-compliance with the requirements of the provision by letter dated 6. 6. 2006 of the government of India, Ministry of Shipping Road transport and Highways, Department of Road transport and Highways issued circular to transport Secretaries and Commissioners of all states and Union Territories 1g (Traffic) police and all the States and Union Territories highlighting non-compliance with the statutory requirements. No action has been taken to comply with the requirements of Section 158 (6 ).
( 2 ) THERE is no dispute that there is statutory requirement to comply with the requirement and actual implementation is very disheartening.
( 3 ) SECTION 158 (6) of the Act reads as under:
"158 (6): As soon as any information regarding any accident involving death or bodily injury to any person is recorded or report under this section is completed by a police officer, the officer-in-charge of the police station shell forward a copy of the same within thirty days from the date of recording of Information or, as the case may be, on completion of such report to the Claims tribunal having jurisdiction and a copy thereof to the concerned insurer, and where a copy is made available to the owner, he shall also within thirty days of receipt of such report, forward the same to such Claims tribunal and Insurer. "
( 4 ) RULE 150 of the Central Motor Vehicles rules, 1989 (in short the 'rules') deals with the matter.
( 5 ) FORM 54 of the Rules provides the format in which the information Is to be given. The Rule and the Form read as follows:
150. Furnishing of copies of reports to Claims tribunal.- (1) The police report referred to in sub-section (6) of section 158 shall bo in Form 54. (2) A registering authority or a police officer who Is required to furnish the required Information to the person eligible to claim compensation under section 160, shall furnish the information in Form 54, within seven days from the date of receipt of the request and on payment of a fee of rupees ten. "
( 6 ) THERE is substance in the plea of Mr. G. N. Vahanvati, learned Solicitor General for the petitioner that if action in terms of Section 158 (6) is taken, it will rule out filing of false claim petitions and the job of the Claims Tribunals will become easier. It is stated by learned counsel that a large number of cases alleging sufficient injuries are being filed long after the accidents and this is adding to the pendency of the claims petitions. If action In terms of Section 158 (6) is taken, it will reduce considerably the filing of false claims. It has been highlighted in the writ petition as follows:
"26. Some salient facts which have emerged from a detailed study on a macro level which are relevant for the purposes of the Instant writ petition may be noticed: 26. 1 As on date there are about 1. 5 million cases pending in. different Tribunals/high courts/supreme Court; 26. 2 About 4 lakh new cases Involving injury/death under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 are reported every year, 26. 3 Claims under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 are reported after about 7 months from the date of accident; 26. 4 Delay in reporting the claim promotes exaggeration and frauds; 28. 5 Delay In repo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.