SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 427

S.H.KAPADIA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
KEMROCK INDUSTRIES AND EXPORTS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA – Respondent


S. H. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a statutory appeal filed by the assessee against the final Order No. 185/2001-D dated 11. 9. 2001 passed by Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ("cegat") in appeal No. E/ 1994-R/97 Mum. The matter pertains to the issue of classification of Glass Fibres impregnated with resins/ plastics.

( 2 ) ASSESSEE-COMPANY is the manufacturer of Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastics. They seek classification of the said item under Heading 70. 14 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. According to the Revenue, the said item is classifiable under Heading 39. 20 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

( 3 ) TO resolve the above controversy, we quote hereinbelow the above two headings.

Heading No. Subheading No. Description of goods Rate of duty 39. 20 Other plates, sheets, film, foil and strip, of plastics, non-cellular, whether lacquered or metallised or laminated, supported or similarly combined with other materials or not Of polymers of vinyl chloride: 3920. 11 Rigid, plain 30% 3920. 12 Flexible, plain 30% 3920. 13 Rigid, lacquered 30% 3920. 14 Flexible, lacquered 30% 3920. 15 Rigid, metallised ??






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top