SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 425

S.H.KAPADIA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
CLARIANT (INDIA) LIMITED, WORLI – Respondent


S. H. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 )

1. This is a civil appeal under Section 130e of Customs Act, 1962 filed by the Department against the order dated November 27, 2000 in Appeal No. C 401/98-Bom passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT), Mumbai.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 herein, during the assessment year 1977-78, imported raw material from M/s Sandoz Quinn (subsidiary of M/s Sandoz (India ). This was under the Technical Collaboration Agreement dated April 2, 1990, between the said two companies. That Technical collaboration agreement provided for import of capital goods, raw materials, intermediates etc. along with transfer of technical know how and technical assistance for upgradation of the respondent's manufacturing plant in India. The respondent is a manufacturer of leather chemical products. Respondent entered into three agreements particulars of which are given at page 36 of the paper book. One of the agreement is called Technical Collaboration Agreement. The other two agreements pertain to import of seeds. According to the technical collaboration agreement the respondent was to import raw materials for manufacture of leather chemical products. The Depar







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top