Supreme Court Of India
NARPAT SINGH - Appellant
Versus
RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION - Respondent
Contempt Petn. (C) 152 Of 2007
Decided On : 09/24/2007
Advocates Appeared :
H.D.Thanvi, PIYUSH JAIN, PUNEET JAIN, Sudhir Kumar Gupta, SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN
I.A. - Clarification and Direction - The court dismissed the application for clarification and direction, stating that such applications are maintainable only in a pending case and not after a case is finally disposed of. The court emphasized that once a case is finally disposed of, the court becomes functus officio, and an application lies ordinarily only for correcting clerical or accidental mistakes.
Fact of the Case:
The court heard the parties and dismissed I.A. Nos. 15-16 for clarification and direction of Court's Order dated 3-5-2007, stating that such applications are totally misconceived and ordinarily not maintainable after a case is finally disposed of.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the I.A. Nos. 15-16 were totally misconceived and dismissed them, emphasizing that such applications are maintainable only in a pending case and not after a case is finally disposed of.
Issues: The issues involved the maintainability of I.A. Nos. 15-16 for clarification and direction after the case was finally disposed of.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once a case is finally disposed of, the court becomes functus officio, and an application lies ordinarily only for correcting clerical or accidental mistakes.
Final Decision: The court dismissed I.A. Nos. 15-16 for clarification and direction, emphasizing that such applications are maintainable only in a pending case and not after a case is finally disposed of.
( 1 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties.
( 2 ) I. A. Nos. 15-16 for clarification and direction of Court's Order dated 3-5-2007 are totally misconceived. Moreover, ordinarily No I. A. lies after a case is finally disposed of. Ordinarily, an I. A. is maintainable only in a pending case. Once a case is finally disposed of the Court becomes functus officio, and thereafter an I. A. lies ordinarily only for correcting clerical or accidental mistakes. The same are accordingly, dismissed.
( 3 ) PUT up the Contempt Petitions (C) No. 151-152 of 2007 in Civil Appeal No. 2181-2182 of 2001 after six months. Application dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.