SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1159

D.K.JAIN, ARIJIT PASAYAT
M. SRINIVASULU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF A. P. – Respondent


ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the andhra Pradesh High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 304b and 498a of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'ipc' ). Sentence of seven years was imposed on each count. By the impugned judgment conviction recorded in respect of co-accused laxmi was set aside and she was directed to by acquitted.

( 2 ) BACKGROUND facts as projected by prosecution in a nutshell are as follows: padma @ Pitchamma (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased') was married to accused No. 1-Srinivasulu on 21. 5. 1989. At the time of marriage, PW. 1 father of the deceased gave rupees 10,000 in cash, five tolas of gold, other household articles worth rs. 3000 and Rs. 1200 towards clothes to accused No. 1, who was employed as sub-staff of Karnataka Bank, Secunderabad. Accused No. 2 is the mother of accused No. 1 and she used to visit accused No. 1 in the city and did not allow the deceased to fulfil conjugal obligations. At the instigation of accused No. 2, accused No. 1 had demanded Rs. 5,000 more from the parents of the deceased to purchase a Scooter




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top