H.K.SEMA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Surjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Markandey Katju, J. —
1. This appeal by special leave has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 10.1.2002 in LPA No. 665 of 2001.
2. Heard Shri R.L. Kapoor, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Amarendra Saran, learned Addl. Solicitor General for the respondent.
3. The facts of the case are that the appellant and his wife are living together at their residence in Rajouri Garden, Delhi. At that residence, there is one telephone line bearing No. 5121187 in the name of appellant Surjit Singh and there is also another telephone line bearing No. 5416493 at the same residence in the name of the appellant’s wife. There is a third telephone line bearing No. 3265301 in the name of the appellant and installed at the business premises of the appellant at 1195, Chahrahat Building, Jama Masjid, Delhi.
4. It appears that there were arrears of telephone dues in connection with line No. 5416493 which was in the name of the appellant’s wife. For non-payment of the telephone dues in connection with this line, the other two lines in the name of the appellant being 5121187 at his residential premises and line No. 3265301 at his bus
Indravadan Pranlal Shah v. General Manager, Ahmedabad Telephones District Kharpur, Ahmedabad
Madan Tayal & Pran Kr. Tayal v. MTNL
R.L. Arora v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dr. B.V. Manek v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd
Y. Pridhvi Kumar v. The General Manager, Telecom District, Hyderabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.