SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 695

S.B.SINHA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
M/s. Super Poly Fabriks Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. —

1. Short question arising in the appeal is whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, the petitioner renders any services so as to incur the liability to pay service tax.

2. The factual background leading to the said question may briefly be noticed.

Appellants herein entered into an agreement with Gas Authority of India Ltd. (GAIL) titled ‘Consignment Stockistship Agreement’.

3. Inter alia, on the premise as to why they should not be asked to pay ‘services taxes’, a show cause notice was issued on the appellant on 20.10.2003. Cause was shown by it saying that no service is being provided by it as a clearing and forwarding agent of GAIL. An order in original was passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise on 17.3.2004 directing payment of service tax with interest as also penalties as demanded under the show cause notice.

4. An appeal preferred thereagainst by the appellant was dismissed by the appellate authority by a judgment and order dated 15.2.2005. A further appeal preferred by the appellant before the Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal has also been dismissed.

5. Mr. P.K. Sahu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of th






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top