SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 874

S.B.SINHA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. SINHA, J.

1. Levy of market fee on Zafrani Zarda in terms of the provisions of the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 (for short, ‘the Act’) is in question in these appeals which arise out of a common judgment and order dated 21st July, 2003.

2. The Act was enacted to provide for the regulation of sale and purchase of agricultural produce and for the establishment, superintendence and control of markets therefor in Uttar Pradesh. 2

3. Before embarking on the question, we may notice some of the relevant provisions of the Act. Section 2(a), 2(d), 6, 8, 17(iii)(b) read as under:

2(a) ‘Agricultural produce’ means such items of produce of agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, apiculture, sericulture, pisciculture, animal husbandry or forest as are specified in the Schedule, and includes admixture of two or more of such items, and also includes any such item in processed form and further includes gur, rab, shakkar, Khandsari and jaggery;

2(a-1) “Board” means the State Agricultural Produce Markets Board constituted under Section 26-A;

2(d) “Central Warehousing Corporation” means the Central Warehousing Corporation established or deemed to be established

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top