SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 893

TARUN CHATTERJEE, DALVEER BHANDARI
Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Director General (Investigation & Registration) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dalveer Bhandari, J.—

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment/order dated 12.10.2000 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the Commission”) in R.T.P. Enquiry No. 204 of 1988.

2. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as under:

A Notice of Enquiry under section 10 (a)(iv) and Section 37 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘MRTP Act’) was issued to the appellants wherein it was alleged that the appellants had indulged in restrictive trade practice within the meaning of Section 2(o)(ii) and section 33(1)(b) and of the MRTP Act.

3. In order to comprehend the controversy involved in this case properly, sections 2(o)(ii) and 33 (1)(b) of the MRTP Act are reproduced as under:

“2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires -

xxx xxx xxx

xxx xxx xxx

(o) “restrictive trade practice” means a trade practice which has, or may have, the effect of preventing, distorting or restricting competition in any manner and in particular,-

(i) .................

(ii) which tends to bring about manipulation of prices, or conditions of deli












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top