ARIJIT PASAYAT, G.S.SINGHVI
Roop Singh @ Rupa – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —
1.In this appeal challenge is to the Judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 449 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC’). The co-accused persons who were similarly convicted were acquitted by the High Court.
2.Background facts in a nutshell are as follows :
Jarnail Singh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) and his wife Nasib Kaur immigrated to Canada about 12 years earlier but had both returned to Kotla about two months before Jarnail Singh’s murder on April 10, 2001. Pala Singh (PW 7) was deceased’s brother in law being the husband of Nasib Kaur’s sister. He also belonged to Kotla. Jarnail Singh lived in his house in the fields, about half a kilometre from the village, on the passage leading to Baghapurana. According to Pala Singh, he and Jarnail Singh used to sleep at night at Jarnail Singh’s farm house while Nasib Kaur would sleep with her sister in Pala Singh’s house. On the evening of April 10, 2001 Nasib Kaur and Pala Singh’s son Darshan Singh had gone to visit Jarna
State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava
C. Chenga Reddy and Ors. v. State of A.P.
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar and Anr. V. State of Madhya Pradesh
Eradu and Ors. v. State of Hyderabad
Referred to : Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi and Ors.
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.