SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1045

C.K.THAKKER, D.K.JAIN
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Reshma Ramesh Meher – Respondent


Judgment

D.K. Jain, J. —

1.Leave granted.

2.The State of Maharashtra, appellant No.1 herein and its functionaries, namely, the Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Social Welfare Department; Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division and Executive Magistrate, Teh. Vasai, District Thane, appellants No.2, 3 and 4 respectively call in question the legality of the Judgment dated 22nd June, 2006, rendered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P. No.5867 of 2002. By the impugned Order the High Court has set aside Order dated 3rd April, 1998 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) allowing the review applications preferred by appellant No.1 herein against its earlier Order dated 15th December, 1997 in O.A. Nos.920 and 921 of 1993, filed by the respondents herein.

3.Pursuant to the applications filed in the year 1980, appellant No.4 issued caste certificates to the respondents declaring them to be belonging to “Mahadeo Koli”, a Scheduled Tribe. On the strength of the caste certificates, the respondents appeared in the competitive examination held by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission, for recruitment to the post of Clerk under the reser























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top