SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1060

ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.SATHASIVAM
Damara Venkata Murali Krishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
Gurujupalli Satvathamma – Respondent


Judgment

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —

1.Leave granted.

2.Challenge in this appeal is to the Judgment of learned Single judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissing the Civil Revision Petition filed by the appellant. Challenge in the Civil Revision Petition was to the Order dated 7.8.2006 passed in I.A. 546 of 2006 in OS No. 9 of 2004 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge at Bobbil. Learned Senior Civil Judge had dismissed the application filed by the defendant i.e. present appellant for action in terms of Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the ‘Act’). Prayer was to send Exh. B1 to B12 to Government Expert for comparison of signatures of CW 1 therein with the admitted signatures appearing on his deposition and summons served on him.

3.Background facts in a nutshell are as follows :

The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit against the petitioner defendant for recovery of Rs.2,28,150/- basing on a promissory note purportedly executed by him over Rs.1,50,000/- on 25.3.2001 and executed a suit promissory note agreeing to repay the same with 18% interest. The petitioner-defendant disputed the suit promissory note. He took the plea that he had some transactions with the so






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top