2008(5) Supreme 460
Supreme Court of india
(From Kerala High Court)
Dr. Arijit Pasayat and P. Sathasivam, JJ.
M/s. Pioma Industries etc.etc. — Appellants
versus
State of Kerala — Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 4639 of 2008
(Arising out of SLP (C) 13521 of 2006)
Decided on : 25-07-2008
Facts of the case :
1. The question is whether “Rasna” is taxable as a `beverage’ or `non-alcoholic drink’. For the two assessment years the relevant entries were Entry 56 and Entry 87 respectively for the year 1997-98 and for the year 1999-2000 Entry 124A, 141 and 97 respectively.
2.The assessing officer, the first Appellate Authority, the Tribunal and the High Court held that “Rasna” is to be taxed as `non- Alcoholic drink’.
Findings of the Court :
1.Effect of splitting of Entry 87 as it stood in the year 1997-98 into two parts i.e. Entries 87 and 124A and their explanation was not considered.
2.The stand taken by the appellants about the article being “beverage” was also not specifically considered by the Assessing Authority, the First appellate Authority, the Tribunal and the High Court. Whether a particular article can be called as a “beverage” has to be factually decided. That analysis has not been done.
3.Similarly, the effect of the introduction of the Entries 124A and 141 with the Assessment year 1999-2000 has not been considered.
Result : Appeal allowed to the extent indicated.
Judgment
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —
1.Leave granted.
2.Challenge in this appeal is to the Judgment of a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court dismissing two revision petitions filed by the appellants i.e. M/s. Pioma Industries, and M/s. Rasna Pvt. Ltd. The assessment years involved are 1997-98 and 1999-2000. The dispute lies within a very narrow compass.
3.The question is whether “Rasna” is taxable as a ‘beverage’ or ‘non-alcoholic drink’. For the two assessment years the relevant entries were Entry 56 and Entry 87 respectively for the year 1997-98 and for the year 1999-2000 Entry 124A, 141 and 97 respectively. The assessing officer, the first Appellate Authority, the Tribunal and the High Court held that “Rasna” is to be taxed as `non- Alcoholic drink’.
4.According to the learned counsel for the appellants, ‘Rasna’ is a powder which is nothing but a soft drink concentrate and cannot be taken to be as ‘non-alcoholic drink’. It is nothing but a fruit in a powder form and a vegetative food preparation. It is pointed out that the legislature in its wisdom has taken out some of the items which were earlier in Entry 87 and have grouped them together under different Entries.
5.Learned counsel for the respondent-State on the other hand submitted that by no stretch of imagination ‘Rasna’ has been treated as ‘food or vegetative’ and has therefore been rightly assessed as ‘non alcoholic drink’.
6.Entries for the two relevant assessment years read as follows :
In the year 1997-98
Entry No. Details of goods Point of levy Rate of tax
56.Food including vegetative or At the point 12.5% animal preparations sold in of first sale in airtight containers and food the State by a colours, essences of all kinds dealer who is and powders or tablets used liable to tax for making food preparations under Section 5 or beverages.
87.Non-alcoholic drinks, Do 20% squashes, sauces Aerated waters, mineral water, beverages Horlicks, Boost, Bournvita, Complan, Glucose-D, Glucovita and similar items whether bottled or canned or packed.
Explanation : Powders, tablets and concentrates used for the preparation of non alcoholic drinks, shall whether or not they are bottled or canned be liable to tax under this entry.
During 1998-99
56.Food including vegetative or At the point of 12.5% animal preparations sold in first sale in the airtight containers and food State by a colours, essences of all kinds dealer who is and powders or tablets used liable to tax for making food preparations under Section 5.
87.Non-alcoholic drinks, Do 20% squashes, sauces Aerated waters, mineral water, beverages Horlicks, Boost, Bournvita, Complan, Glucose-D, Glucovita and similar items whether bottled or canned or packed.
Explanation : Powders, tablets and concentrates used for the preparation of non alcoholic drinks, shall whether or not they are bottled or canned be liable to tax under this entry.
During 1999-2000 till 31.12.1999
87.Non alcoholic drinks whether Do 25% bottled or canned or packed Explanation: Powders, tablets granules and concentrates used for the preparation of non-alcoholic drinks, shall whether or not they are bottled or canned be liable to tax under this entry.
124A Squashes, sauces soda, Do 20% mineral water Horlicks, Boost Bournvita, Complan, Glucose-D, Glucovita and similar items whether or not bottled canned or packed.
Explanation: powders, tablets, granules and concentrates used for the preparation of beverages shall, whether or not they are bottled or canned, be liable to tax under this entry.
From 1-1-2000
97.Non alcoholic drinks whether Do 25% or not bottled or canned or packed.
Explanation _ Powders, tablets, granules and concentrates used for the preparation of non-alcoholic drinks, shall whether or not they are bottled or canned be liable to tax under this entry.
141.Squashes, sauces, fruit juice, Do 20% fruit pulp, soda, mineral water, Horlicks, Boost, Bournvita Complan, Glucose-D, Glucovita and similar items whether or not bottled canned or packed.
Explanation : Powders, table
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.