SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1215

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Aizaz – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants :Ratnakar Dash and J.C. Gupta, Sr. Advs., Dharm Singh and Rajesh, Advocates.
For the Respondent:T.N. Singh, Rajeev Dubey and Kamlendra Mishra, Advocates.
Important Point
Where parties go with a common purpose to execute a common object each and every person becomes responsible for act of each and every other in execution and furtherance of their common purpose; as the purpose is common, so must be the responsibility.
Mere presence of a person at the time of commission of an offence by his confederates is not, in itself sufficient to bring his case within the purview of Section 34, unless community of designs is proved against him.

Judgment

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —

1.Appellants call in question legality of the Judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court upholding the conviction of the appellants for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC’). So far as the appellant Aizaz- A1 is concerned, the High Court also upheld his conviction for offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC. The two other appellants were found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC. It is to be noted that four persons faced trial though the learned VIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut found A-1 to A-3 guilty. The High Court directed acquittal of Imlak (A-4).

2.Background facts as projected by prosecution in a nutshell are as follows :

All the four accused are inter related and they lived in village Ikla Rasoolpur, police station Parichhatgarh, district Meerut. Informant of the case Bashir Mohammed (P.W.1) as well as Ismail (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) also lived in the same village. About 2= years earlier to the date of occurrence i.e. 4.11.1979 one Riazu disappeared









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top