V.S.SIRPURKAR, ASHOK BHAN
Camlin Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commnr. of Central Excise, Mumbai – Respondent
Judgment
Ashok Bhan, J. —
1.These three sets of appeals arise from a common Judgment and Order dated 30th April, 2002 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Western Zonal Bench at Mumbai (for short “the Tribunal”).
2.The first set of appeals being C.A. Nos. 4507-4508 of 2002 has been filed by M/s. Camlin Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the Assessee”), whereas the remaining two sets of appeals being C.A. Nos. 1692-1693 of 2003 & C.A. No. 978 of 2005 have been filed by the Revenue.
3.The issues in these appeals are regarding the classification of the “writing inks” being manufactured and captively consumed by the assessee and consequent demand of duty thereon. The inks with their constituents are:-
No. NAME OF THE INKS INGREDIENTS
1.99-Marker Inksi) Ketonic Solvent
ii) Solvent Dyes
iii) Binders
2.100-Camel Fount Drawing Inki) Carbon Black (Pigment)
ii) Shellac Binder
iii)Water & Preservatives
3.07-Camel Waterproofi) Carbon Black (Pigment)
Drawing Ink ii) Shellac Binder
iii)Water & Preservatives
4.09-Camel Spl. Drawingi) Carbon Black (Pigment)
Ink Black ii) Shellac Binder
iii)Water & Preservatives
5.98-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.