2008(6) Supreme 451
Supreme Court of india
C.K. Thakker and D.K. Jain, JJ.
Fakhruddin Ahmad — Appellant
versus
State of Uttaranchal & Anr. — Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 1408 of 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) No. 3482 of 2006)
Decided on : 05-09-08
Facts of the Case :
1.A Complaint alleging dishonour of cheque was filed by appellant herein in the instant case against complainant.On notice under Section 138 of NI Act, 1881 complainant cooked up a story that he had issued blank cheques bearing his signatures to one ‘S’ as security for Rs.30,000/-borrowed by him and that ‘S’ misplaced said blank cheque, which was fraudulently used by the appellant by filling up amount of Rs.8,65,000/- A Complaint was lodged by Complainant against appellant alleging commission of offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. Order was passed by Magistrate, directing police to register case and investigate it. Petition thereagainst u/s 482 of Cr.pc was filed by appellant for quashment of proceedings. Said petition was Dismissed by High Court.
2.Present appeal has been filed by appellant against said order of High Court.
Findings of the Court :
In order to arrive at a conclusion, whether or not the appellant had made out a case for quashing of the chargesheet against him, High Court ought to have taken into consideration material which was placed before Magistrate. For dismissal of petition, High Court had to record a finding that uncontroverted allegations, as made, established a prima facie case against appellant.Decision of High Court dismissing petition filed by appellant on ground that it was not permissible for it to look into materials placed before Magistrate was not in consonance with broad parameters to be applied while dealing with a petition under Section 482 of the Code for discharge. Impugned order of High Court being unsustainable was set aside and matter was remitted back to High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Result : Appeal disposed of.
Judgment
D.K. Jain, J. —
1.Leave granted.
2.This appeal, by special leave, arises from the Order dated 21st June, 2006 passed by the High Court of Uttaranchal in Criminal Misc. Application No.434 of 2006. By the impugned Order, the High Court has dismissed the petition preferred by the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’), seeking quashing of the chargesheet dated 16th December, 2005 and consequent proceedings initiated against him by respondent No.2 in this appeal, hereinafter referred to as the complainant, for allegedly committing offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the I.P.C.’).
3.A few material facts giving rise to the present appeal are :
The appellant owns a poultry farm. According to the appellant, he used to supply chickens to the complainant and his partner on cash and credit basis. On 15th June, 2005, the complainant is stated to have issued a cheque in the sum of Rs.8,65,000/- drawn on Union Bank of India in favour of the appellant against the balance payment due. When the cheque was presented for payment, it was returned unpaid by the Bank with the remarks ‘having no fund’. Thereupon, on 7th September, 2005, the appellant served a legal notice on the complainant and his partner in terms of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the Act’), calling upon them to make payment against the said cheque. On getting the said notice, the complainant is stated to have cooked up a story that he had issued blank cheques bearing his signatures to one Salim Ali as security for Rs.30,000/- borrowed by him along with a guarantee receipt dated 25th June, 2005 on a stamp paper. Salim Ali misplaced the aforementioned blank cheque, which was fraudulently used by the appellant by filling up the amount of Rs.8,65,000/- and was presented to the banker for encashment. The complainant claims to have informed the bank about the loss of the cheque.
4.On 15th September, 2005, the complainant lodged a complaint against the appellant before the Judicial Magistrate alleging commission of offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. The learned Magistrate, vide his Order dated 19th September, 2005, directed the police to register the case and investigate it. In the meanwhile, on 10th October, 2005, the appellant filed a complaint against the complainant and his partner under Section 138 of the Act and Section 420 I.P.C. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the complaint and issued summons against the complainant.
5.Aggrieved by the filing of the complaint by the complainant, the appellant moved the High Court for quashing of the proceedings before the Magistrate. As noted above, the High Court declined to interfere. Dismissing the petition, the High Court observed thus :
“The prosecution has collected the evidence in this matter, though the evidence has not been filed before this Court by the applicant. Non-presentation of the statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. leads me to take an assumption that the prosecution has led the evidence to support to the contention of the complainant. If there is an evidence and it discloses the prima facie case (sic) against the present applicant, there is no requirement of the said statement at this stage. If the applicant wants to make any such averment or submission that it cannot be believed on account of certain contradictions in the documents, it can only be raised during the trial. This court cannot evaluate the disputed facts of the case. This court cannot decide as to whether the evidence is reliable or not.”
Hence the present appeal.
6.Mr. Salman Khurshid, learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted before us that the Order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition is unsustainable both in law as also on facts of the case. It was contended that the High Court failed to appreciate that the Magistrate had decided to pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.