C.K.THAKKER, D.K.JAIN
Pramod Kumar Saxena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Judgment
C.K. Thakker, J. —
1.Rule. We have heard the learned counsel appearing in the case. On the facts and in circumstances of the case, the writ petition has been taken up for final hearing.
2.The present petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Constitution. The prayer clause reads thus;
“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:-
(a)Issue appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus or any direction or Order to release the petitioner on bail in connection with the cases as mentioned in Annexure P-14 forthwith on execution of personal bond with or without sureties; and
(b)Issue appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or any direction or Order directing that if the petitioner is arrested in connection with any criminal case in capacity of Managing Director of Imperial Forestry Corporation Ltd., the arresting officer shall release him on bail on his executing the personal bond to the satisfaction of arresting officer; and
(c)Issue appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus or any direction or Order directing the respondents to evolve a mechanism to ensure the presence of the petitioner in all the cases as well
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.