MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Steel Authority of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants. Challenge was to the reference made by the Government of West Bengal of a purported industrial dispute under Section 7-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’). According to the appellants, the reference was incompetent in view of what has been stated by this Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers,1 (2001(7) SCC 1).
3. Factual scenario as projected by the appellants in the present appeal and the writ petition is as follows :
Respondent No.4 i.e. National Union of Water Front Worker (in short the ‘Union’) made a representation to Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) on 21.4.1987 seeking conciliation of proceeding for regularization of services of members of its Union who were working as contract labours with M/s Bardhan and Co. under principal employers i.e. the present appellants. Another representation was made on 4.6.1987 to the Labour Commissioner claiming the status of the workers as contract labours of aforesaid M/s Bardhan
Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union
S.M. Nilajkar v. Telecom District Manager
Nedungadi Bank Ltd. v. K.P. Madhavankutty
Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers
State of Haryana v. Charanjit Singh
U.P. State Road Transport Corpn. v. Babu Ram (2006)5 SCC 433 – Relied upon. [Para 9]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.