SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 58

S.B.SINHA
Benjamin – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by Inspector of Police – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. SINHA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th January, 2006 passed by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.142 of 1997 whereby and whereunder the appeal filed by the appellant against an order of conviction dated 30th January, 1997 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul Anna District, was dismissed.

3. Appellant with Jesu Raj and Arokiyam were proceeded against for commission of an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first and second accused were charged for commission of an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code whereas the third accused was charged for commission of an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 thereof.

4. Enmity between the parties is admitted. There were instances to show that the accused had been causing various kinds of mischief. The incident in question occurred on 26th November, 1994. Two years prior thereto, accused Nos. 1 and 3 assaulted the deceased and PW-4, Viyakula Mary. Four months thereafter, the appellant (ac























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top