SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 729

S.B. Sinha & V.S. Sirpurkar
Viswanathan & Ors - PETITIONER
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu - RESPONDENT
Appeal (crl.) 97 of 2004
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.97 OF 2004
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.100, 99, 98 and 629 of 2004 and 785 of 2005
Decided On: 29/04/2008

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code , 1860 - Section 375 - Section 376 – Rape - Incident took place and victim was working as a Coolie - She was married and had two children - She was returning to her home on a bicycle with her brother, Palanisamy at about 10 -00 pm after watching a movie - Appellants herein allegedly joining hands with each other, chased them - They were riding on their own bicycles - They dashed with bicycle of Palanisamy - Palanisamy and victim fell on ground - Allegedly, victim was asked to enjoy herself - Palanisamy, when questioned about said conduct on part of accused who was known to victim as a mason, was slapped by accused - He ran away out of fear - Victim was taken at a nearby place and accused allegedly raped her one after other - She lost her consciousness – Held , One appended to said provision clearly states that persons who have common intention to commit said offence would also be liable in terms - Common intention of all accused need not be supported by fact that each one of them took part in actual commission of offence - Very fact that they came on cycles and dashed with cycle of PW7 would clearly show that they had a common intention to commit offence - If they had common intention of committing offence, they although were chargedin general, they could be convicted also as latter is merely a graver form of offence of rape as defined - They not only gathered and obstructed her from proceeding towards her residence with her brother in bicycle but also deliberately making her and her brother to fall down from cycle - She was physically removed to a secluded place and at least three of them took part in committing offence of rape on her one by one - Evidence of PW6 to aforementioned extent is cogent and convincing and has been corroborated by PW7 who not only is a witness of events which took place immediately prior to actual occurrence of rape but also a witness to scene of occurrence where he found his sister lying naked in an unconscious state - Material objects were found to have semen stains - Accused were also tested as regards proof of potency and doctors who examined them categorically came to conclusion that they were not incapable of committing sexual intercourse - There may be some inconsistency as pointed with regard to recovery of clothes or sending same for chemical examination, but our findings on aforementioned grounds, in our opinion, are sufficient to prove common intention on part of accused – Appeals dismissed

JUDGMENT:

S.B. Sinha, J. -- Appellants herein, who are six in number, have preferred these appeals from a common judgment and order dated 6.3.2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras.

2. Appellants were convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. 3.

3. The incident took place on 20.11.1994. The victim was working as a Coolie. She was married and had two children. She was returning to her home on a bicycle with her brother, Palanisamy at about 10.00 pm after watching a movie. Appellants herein allegedly joining hands with each other, chased them. They were riding on their own bicycles. They dashed with the bicycle of the Palanisamy. Palanisamy and the victim fell on the ground. Allegedly, victim was asked to enjoy herself. Palanisamy, when questioned about the said conduct on the part of accused No.1 Babu, who was known to the victim as a mason, was slapped by the accused No.1. He ran away out of fear.

4. The victim was taken at a nearby place and accused No.2 to 4 and 6, allegedly raped her one after the other. She lost her consciousness.

5. Palanisamy went to the village and brought some people with him. They found the victim lying naked in an unconscious condition. PW8, Chinnadurai, and others poured water on her face. She was taken home after she regained her consciousness.

6. She regained her composure in the evening. They came to the Police Station and lodged the First Information Report at about 7.00 pm on 21.11.1994. She was medically examined at about 0720 hours on 22.11.1994. No injury on her person, however, was found. No injury on her private part was also noticed. In the FIR, accused Nos.1 to 4 were named. Accused Nos.5 and 6 were not named. It was said to be a moonlit night. All the accused, however, were not put on the Test Identification Parade. On completion of investigation, they were charge sheeted and put on trial.

7. Admittedly, no charge under Section 376(2)(g) was framed.

8. The allegations made against them in the FIR read as under :

"On the moonlight, I identify one person is Babu who is working as a mason along with another three persons were standing along with backside of cycle.

All the accused were laughed at me when I was standing at Kariampalayam bus stop to go for work. I saw them. Babu called me to come with him. Immediately my brother asked about this, suddenly Babu slapped him. Then Babu rushed with tears in the said cycle. All the three persons rushed me to the damaged wall building and place me near the tank. I tried to escape from them. The three persons pushed me with force and closed the mouth with my saree. I cannot do anything. I saw all the faces in the moon light. Babu called one Thangavely and told him that to go with me. Thangavelu placed on me without dress and raped me. Next Thangavely sent one Sakthi. He also raped me. Next Babu called one Murugesan and sent to me. He also raped me. Then I felt unconscious. I do not know about the further matter. When I awakened, the village people, my brother, my uncle Chinnan and others poured water on my face and help me to get up. I felt serious pain and am crying and weeping. My brother helped me to reach my house. I am not able to get up since I lay down in the bed. In the evening I feel better. Immediately I and my brother come to the police station and explain the matter."

9. Before the learned trial Judge 10 witnesses were examined, material amongst them is the victim herself (PW-6) and her brother, Palanisamy (PW-7). Before the learned Trial Judge, the victim did not identify all the accused. She identified accused No.1, 2 and 3. The names of accused Nos.5 and




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top