SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 264

S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
BANT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NIRANJAN SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. – Respondent


ADVOCATES APPEARED:
P.N. Puri, Advocate, for the Appellants;
Manoj Swarup and Rohit Sohgaura, Advocates, for the Respondents.

Judgment

S.B. SINHA, J.- Application of Section 50 of the Evidence Act, 1872 is involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 27-8-2003 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Regular Second Appeal No. 1290 of 1982 allowing the appeal from d a judgment and order dated 12-3-1982 passed by the Additional District Judge, Patiala setting aside the judgment and decree dated 31-3-1981 passed by the Subordinate Judge, First Class, Patiala decreeing the suit of the respondents. Before embarking upon the said question, we may notice the genealogical tree of the parties:

Chartu

__________________________________________________________________

I I I

Munshi (son) Bakhtawar (son) Nandi(daughter)

I (died without leaving I I

Niranjan Singh any Class 1 heir) Bant Singh Bachan Kaur

(respondent -plaintiff) (son) (daughter)

(Appellant-Defendants 1 and 2)

2. Chartu died in 1935. According to the appellants upon death of Chartu, the properti











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top