ASHOK BHAN, V.S.SIRPURKAR
Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Sony India Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V.S. Sirpurkar, J. —
An Order by Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter called “the Tribunal” for short), allowing the appeal filed by M/s Sony India Ltd. (the respondent herein), is in challenge at the instance of the appellant herein. The said appeal was filed challenging the order-in-original dated 30.1.1999, passed by Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot, Tughlakabad, New Delhi, wherein the said Authority had confirmed the said differential duty demand of Rs.42,89,75,196/- under the Proviso to Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). The penalty was also imposed amounting to Rs.30,19,92,183/- under Section 112(a) read with Section 114(a) with interest under Section 28 AB of the Act. By the order of the Commissioner, the import of several parts of Colour Television (hereinafter called “CTV” for short) made by the appellant for the period from April 1995 to 1997 were treated as import of complete CTV Sets for the purpose of assessment by the Commissioner.
2. Initially, there was difference of opinion amongst the two Learned Members of the Tribunal on the application of Rule 2(a) of the General Rul
Vareli Weaves Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Girdhari Lal Bhansidhar v. Union of India
Simplex Mills v. Union of India
Trident Television Pvt. Ltd. v. CC
Vishal Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Bombay
Sharp Business Machines v. CCE, Bangalore
Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi v. Phoenix International Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.