SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1522

ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Seema Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Mayank Bansal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Kajal Chandra and Sanjeev Anand, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Ashok Mathur, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —

1. Though the present transfer petition has been filed for transfer of a case from Lalitpur to Delhi, the matter was directed to be listed at the Supreme Court Lok Adalat which was held on 6th September, 2008, to explore the possibility of bringing out a solution to the marital discords. With the assistance of the Mediators, the parties were heard and following terms for settling the disputes were arrived at:

1. That the respondent shall pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs towards maintenance of the daughter (Tanishka). The said sum will be payable in annul instalment of Rs.2.5 lacs each payable on or before 31st August. The first instalment to be paid on or before 31.8.2009. The fourth and last instalment shall be paid on or before 31.8.2012.

2. The above amount shall be kept in a fixed deposit in the name of Ms. Taniksha.

3.(a) Till such amount of Rs.10 lacs is paid, the respondent shall pay a monthly sum of Rs.7500/- (Rupees seven thousand five hundred only) by the end of each month commencing from September, 2008.

(b) That the petitioner will not be claiming any sums towards alimony and/or maintenance except that she will be entitled to her share of 25%










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top