SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1522

2008(7) Supreme 491
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. Arijit Pasayat and Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ.
Smt. Seema Bansal — Appellant
versus
Dr. Mayank Bansal — Respondent
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 683 of 2007
Decided on : 16-10-08

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Kajal Chandra and Sanjeev Anand, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Ashok Mathur, Advocate.

Headnote:Transfer Petition – Petition for transfer of a case from Lalitpur to Delhi – However matter was directed to be listed at Supreme Court Lok Adalat to explore the possibility of bringing out a solution to the marital discords – With the assistance of the Mediators, parties were heard and terms for settling the disputes were arrived at wherein respondent was to pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs towards maintenance of daughter – Till such amount of Rs.10 lacs was paid, respondent was to pay a monthly sum of Rs.7500/- by the end of each month commencing from September, 2008 – In terms of agreement petitioner would not be claiming any sums towards alimony and/or maintenance except that she would be entitled to her share of 25% in the immoveable property bearing No.1301, Jaj Bagh, Manja Pachora, Opposite Gate No.2, Medical College, Jhani – The parties agreed to withdraw all civil/criminal cases pending in the concerned court – In view of said agreement transfer petition disposed of. (Paras 1 to 3)

       Facts of the Case :

        A Petition was filed herein in the instant case for transfer of a case from Lalitpur to Delhi.However matter was directed to be listed at Supreme Court Lok Adalat to explore the possibility of bringing out a solution to the marital discords.

       Findings of the Court :

        With the assistance of the Mediators, parties were heard and terms for settling the disputes were arrived at wherein respondent was to pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs towards maintenance of daughter. The parties agreed to withdraw all civil/criminal cases pending in the concerned court. In view of said agreement transfer petition was disposed of.

       Result : Transfer petition disposed of.

       

JUDGMENT

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —

1. Though the present transfer petition has been filed for transfer of a case from Lalitpur to Delhi, the matter was directed to be listed at the Supreme Court Lok Adalat which was held on 6th September, 2008, to explore the possibility of bringing out a solution to the marital discords. With the assistance of the Mediators, the parties were heard and following terms for settling the disputes were arrived at:

1. That the respondent shall pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs towards maintenance of the daughter (Tanishka). The said sum will be payable in annul instalment of Rs.2.5 lacs each payable on or before 31st August. The first instalment to be paid on or before 31.8.2009. The fourth and last instalment shall be paid on or before 31.8.2012.

2. The above amount shall be kept in a fixed deposit in the name of Ms. Taniksha.

3.(a) Till such amount of Rs.10 lacs is paid, the respondent shall pay a monthly sum of Rs.7500/- (Rupees seven thousand five hundred only) by the end of each month commencing from September, 2008.

(b) That the petitioner will not be claiming any sums towards alimony and/or maintenance except that she will be entitled to her share of 25% in the immoveable property bearing No.1301, Jaj Bagh, Manja Pachora, Opposite Gate No.2, Medical College, Jhani.

4. The parties hereby agree to withdraw all the civil/criminal cases pending in the concerned court which are mentioned below:

(1) O.S. No.161 of 2007 (Dr. Mayank Bansal pending before Ld. Civil Judge, Ms. Seema, Senior Division, Lalitpur, U.P.)

(2) Criminal Complaint arising from FIR No.605 of 2007 u/s 406, 498A IPC, PS Pandav Nagar, Delhi.

(3) HMA No.7005/07 u/s 125 Cr.P.C. pending before Ms. Neeraj Shatiya, Civil Judge, Karkadooma, Delhi.

5. The Respondent will be entitled to visitation rights to meet the daughter Tanishka on 2nd and 4th Sunday of each month with prior notice by each party. The Respondent will be entitled to take the child on an outing during such visits. The Respondent will drop the child back in such event.

6. The Respondent will also be entitled to meet the child on or other special occasions subject to availability.

7. The petitioner submits that the particulars of the immoveable property mentioned above have not been verified by her and the same are subject to verification.

2. In terms of the agreement at serial no.3 (a), a draft of Rs.7,500/- for the month of September, 2008, has been handed over to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in court today.

3. In view of the aforesaid agreement the transfer petition is disposed of on the terms as set out above. The proceedings as noted above stand closed.

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top