SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1495

2008(7) Supreme 493
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Bombay High Court)
Arijit Pasayat and Mukundakam Sharma, JJ.
Siddhapal Kamala Yadav — Appellant
versus
State of Maharashtra — Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1602 of 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 509 of 2008)
Decided on : 13-10-2008

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. M. Qamaruddin and Ambar Qamaruddin, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Gopal Balwant Sathe, Gautam Godara, Ms. Anjani Kr. Mishra and R.K. Adsure, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Every person, who is mentally diseased, is not ipso facto exempted from criminal responsibility.

Headnote:(a) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 84 r/w section 105, Indian Evidence Act, 1972 – Every person, who is mentally diseased, is not ipso facto exempted from criminal responsibility – A distinction is to be made between legal insanity and medical insanity and Court is concerned with legal insanity, and not with medical insanity – The burden of proof rests on an accused to prove his insanity. (Para 7)

        AIR 1964 SC 1563 – Relied upon.

        (b) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 84 – Ingredients and applicability discussed. (Paras 9 to 11)

        (1972 Cr.LJ 1523 (SC); (1843) 4 St. Tr. (NS) 847 – Relied upon.

       Facts of the case :

        1. The incident occurred at about 4.00 a.m. of 19.7.2002, at Ward No.14 of Civil Hospital, Jalgaon, where the appellant and the victim Dilip Sitaram Chaudhary (the deceased) were lodged.

        2. On hearing noise when the guards entered the wardroom they found the victim hanging from his cot with head injury. He was declared dead.

        3. The trial Court discarded the defence of mental illness raised by the accused and found him guilty.

        4. The High Court dismissed the appeal.

       Finding of the Court :

        Available evidence showed that the appellant’s plea relating to unsoundness of mind has no substance.

       Result : Appeal dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant who was found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case No.140 of 2002 and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine with default stipulation.

3. The prosecution case unfolded through depositions of ASI Ukhadu Tadvi (PW-2), hospital nurse Smt. Suman Bhave (PW-3) and guard Bhagwat Sutar (PW-4), also complaint (Exhibit 18) that was filed by ASI Tadvi, on behalf of the State. The incident in question took place on the night between 18th and 19th July, 2002. To be precise, it took place at about 4.00 a.m. of 19.7.2002, at Ward No.14 of Civil Hospital, Jalgaon, where the appellant and the victim Dilip Sitaram Chaudhary (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) were lodged.

The complainant ASI Tadvi was posted on guard duty at the said prisoners’ cell in the Civil Hospital. There were other four policemen also, along with him, namely, Police Constables Ibrahim, Bhagwat, Gokul and Police Naik Sattar. Victim Dilip was admitted for treatment since 14.7.2002. On 18.7.2002, the appellant was admitted for treatment with the complaint that he was murmuring to himself, like a lunatic. Both, the victim and the appellant, were lodged in Ward No.14 in a common room. ASI and 4 plicemen were the party on guard, posted at the said ward.

On the fateful night, there was no electricity supply. At about 3.30 a.m. on 19.7.2002, constable Gokul was on duty. Since it was raining, policemen occupied a location at the ground floor of the hospital. Gokul alone was in the guardroom, by the side of the prisoners ward.

At about 4.00 a.m. Police Constable Gokul, on duty, shouted, “Dada run, there is a noise of violence in the prisoners’ room”.

Consequently, entire guard party rushed to the Wardroom and it was opened. As ASI Tadvi entered the room, he was grabbed by the appellant. However, all policemen managed to control the appellant and again put him on the bed, where he was asked to sleep on the night with handcuff. It was noticed at that time that, the appellant had freed himself from the handcuff. It was noticed that the co-prisoner was not on the bed, but was hanging from the cot, his leg still was locked to the bed with the fetter. Iron stand, used for hanging a saline bottle, was lying by his side. It was also noticed that Dilip, the deceased who was hanging by the side of the cot, had suffered head injury. The prisoner, who was caught by the guard and who had escaped from the handcuff, was the appellant. In the meanwhile, electricity supply was resumed by the hospital generator. Nurse Suman (PW-3) had arrived there, who summoned Resident Medical Officer (in short ‘RMO’). The RMO and other doctors then carried the victim Dilip on a stretcher to the room of Casualty Medical Officer (CMO) Dr. Survade, who, after sometime, informed that the victim had expired. Intimation to that effect was sent to Zilla Peth Police Station.

A detailed complaint, narrating these events, was lodged by ASI Tadvi to the said Police Station, which was registered as First Information Report at 08.30 hours and after investigation and committal of the case, trial, which culminated into impugned judgment before the High Court, was held.

As already described hereinabove, ASI Tadvi (PW-2), so also nurse Suman (PW-3) and Police Constable Bhagwat (PW-4), are the persons, who reached the location in response to call by guard on duty, Police Constable Gokul. Other set of important witnesses is of four doctors. Dr. Surwade (PW-5), was the CMO, who had reached the location upon call by nurse Suman. Dr. Bhalchandra (PW-8) had performed autopsy. He has recorded an opinion that, the death was result of head injury sustained with multiple rib fracture,





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top