C.K.THAKKER, D.K.JAIN
Hardeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
C.K. Thakker, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. Both the parties in the High Court have filed present appeals against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, dated October 23, 2006 in Criminal Revision Nos. 773 of 2006 and 1648 of 2006.
3. To appreciate the contentions raised by the parties, it would be appropriate to narrate few facts.
4. In the appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 166 of 2007, the case of the prosecution is that an auction for leasing the land was held by the Gram Panchayat of village Indrapuri, Tehsil Samana, District Patiala on April 21, 2004 for cultivation on yearly basis (Eksali) for the year 2004-05. The bid of the appellant was accepted and lease was granted in his favour. The appellant was thus in possession of the land.
5. According to the prosecution, on June 24, 2004, the appellant was ploughing the land. The accused persons went there with deadly weapons and caused injuries to the appellant as well as other prosecution witnesses. First Information Report (FIR) was lodged against the accused at Police Station Sadar, Samana for commission of offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 336 and 427 read wi
State of H.P. v. Surinder Mohan and Ors.
Michael Machado and Anr. V. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
Rakesh and Anr. V. State of Haryana
Shashikant Singh v. Tarkeshwar Singh and Anr.
Krishnappa v. State of Karnataka
REFERRED TO : Joginder Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Ram Kishan Rohtagi and Ors.
Y. Saraba Reddy v. Puthur Rami Reddy and Anr.
Guriya and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.