ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.SATHASIVAM
MANGOO ALIAS MANGAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
Judgment
DR. ARUIT PASAYAT, J.- Though the petition was filed as a writ petition and was numbered as WP (Crl.) No. 192 of 2005, by order dated 1-4-2005 it was noted that in the notice it shall be indicated that the writ petition shall be treated as a special leave petition against the judgment of the High Court and shall be disposed of in the light of this Courts judgment in Ghapoo Yadav v. State of M.P.
2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:
Five persons faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Penal Code, 1860 (in short "IPC"). The trial court convicted all the five accused persons including the appellant in this writ petition and sentenced him to undergo RI for life. All the accused persons preferred appeal which was numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 718 of 1989 before the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur. The High Court by its judgment dated 18-4-2001 dismissed the appeal. Three of the accused persons filed Special Leave Petition No. 4782 of 2002 which was admitted and registered as Criminal Appeal No. 229 of 2003. The appellant admittedly did not file any special leave petition. By judgment dated 17-2-2
Gurucharan Kumar v. State of Rajasthan
Referred to : Ghapoo Yadav v. State of M.P.
Suresh Chaudharyv. State of Bihar
Dandu Lakshmi Reddy v. State of A. P.
Bijoy Singh and Anr. v. State of Bihar
Akhil AH Jehangir AH Sayyed v. State of Maharashtra
Vajrapu Sambayya Naidu and Ors. v. State of A.P. and Ors.
Apren Joseph v. State of Kerala
HariNath and Anr. v. State ofU.P.
Hardyal and Premv. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.