SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1158

B.N.KIRPAL, K.VENKATASWAMI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
V. K. SIROTHIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard counsel on both sides.

2. The finding of the Tribunal that "the so-called promotion as a result of redistribution of posts is not promotion attracting reservation" on the facts of the case, appears to be based on good reasoning. On facts, it is seen that it is a case of upgradation on account of restructuring of the cadres, therefore, the question of reservation will not arise. We do not find any ground to interfere with the order of the Tribunal.

3. The civil appeal is dismissed. No costs.

4. In view of the order passed in Civil Appeal No. 3622 of 1995, etc., this appeal has to be allowed as in the order under appeal the Tribunal has taken a contrary view. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top