SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1309

B.N.AGARWAL, G.S.SINGHVI
PRAMOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ADVOCATES APPEARED
Satyajit A. Desai, Anagha S. Desai and Venkateshwara Rao Anumolu, Advocates, for the Petitioner;
S.M. Jadhav, Ms Asha G. Nair and Ms Gargi Khanna, Advocates, for the Respondents.

ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. It appears that on 16-4-2008 four weeks time was granted to the petitioner to take steps for substitution of legal representatives of Respondent 5. Thereafter, on 12-5-2008 four weeks time was granted by way of last chance for taking the aforesaid steps. Though a period of more than three months from that date has expired, the petitioner has not bothered to file any substitution application. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he has sent several letters to his client but he is not responding. Respondent 5 is the only contesting party in this case. As no steps have been taken for substitution of the legal representatives of deceased Respondent 5, we have no option but to dismiss the special leave petition, the same having become defective.

3. The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top