B.N.AGARWAL, HARJIT SINGH BEDI, G.S.SINGHVI
SAKHARAM GANESH AARAVANDEKAR – Appellant
Versus
MAHADEO VINAYAK MATHKAR – Respondent
ORDER
1. Taken on board. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
2. The petitioners are, however, granted time till 30-11-2008 to vacate the premises in question upon filing undertaking to this effect in this Court within four weeks from today.
3. It is needless to say that in case the respondents feel aggrieved by this order, it would be open to them to move this Court for its recall.
4. It is directed that in case the petitioners fail to vacate the premises in question within the aforesaid time, it would be open to the decree-holder to file an execution petition for delivery of possession and in case such a petition has been already filed, an application shall be filed therein to the effect that the petitioners have not vacated the premises in question within the time granted by this Court.
5. In either eventuality, the executing court is not required to issue any notice to the petitioners. The executing court will see that delivery of possession is effected within a period of fifteen days from the date of filing of the execution petition or the application af
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.