ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.SATHASIVAM, AFTAB ALAM
Reshma Bano – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissing the application filed by the appellant for exercise of power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Code) and Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in short the Constitution). The prayer in the writ petition was to quash the proceedings initiated on the basis of FIR Crime No.316 of 2007, P.S. Phoolpur, Allahabad. It was submitted before the High Court that the FIR did not disclose any offence so far as the appellant is concerned. It was pointed out that the appellant was the sister of the accused no.1 Afzal who was alleged to have committed the offence of kidnapping etc. The High Court dismissed the application holding that on reading of the FIR, cognizable offence is made out.
3. In support of the appeal learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the only reference made to the appellant in the FIR reads as follows:
"Questioning from the sister of the boy, Smt. Reshma Bano, might be advantageous".
4. This does not indicate commission of any offence rather puts the appellant in the po
REFERRED TO : State of Haryana and Ors. v. Bhajan Lal and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.